True SaaS solutions are purpose-built for cloud deployment. And, your typical off-the-shelf integration platform usually won’t work with a SaaS deployment. Most cloud integrations fail if they were retrofitted or replicated from their on-premise counterparts. Not all integration workflows fit well in the SaaS model, so the SaaS provider and customer need to work together to assess the integration workflows and adjust data mappings and business flows, if necessary. The real issue revolves around how the SaaS solution is designed. Additionally, Pervasive offers both cloud-based and on-premise solutions, and may not be representative of the many vendors who specialize in 100% cloud-based solutions. Moreover, if you flip Pervasive’s statistics around, the outlook doesn’t seem so bleak: More than 50% of its integrations have few or no difficulties and 80% are successful. But does this mean that we should abandon the idea and stick with our slow, expensive, hard-to-maintain on-premises solutions? Certainly not. Now, I don’t think any of us expect the process of moving from a computing model littered with legacy on-premise solutions to a more dynamic, flexible and cost-cutting cloud-based infrastructure to be completely seamless. Security, he says, is another big concern. “These figures punch a big hole in the theory that SaaS is the end of the rainbow for enterprise IT,” said Proffitt. Proffitt goes on to quote a general manager at Pervasive, who states that 49% of the company’s potential customers report difficulties with post-deployment integration, resulting in the company abandoning 20% of its SaaS migrations. Mobile Professional Services AutomationĪccording to a March 5th post to, SaaS has a “dirty little secret.” Integration, says technology expert Brian Proffitt, is still a problem for companies adopting SaaS solutions.The lawsuit was dismissed, according to court documents from January 2018. Sheriff Kenney Boone, Glen Kirby and John Doe also were named in the lawsuit because they were alleged to have engaged in “overt acts and omission in furtherance of a conspiracy resulting in the deprivation of constitutional rights of the plaintiffs.”īoone, Kirby and Doe were also accused in the lawsuit of “conspiring to cover up the constitutional violations of” Proffitt. In a deposition, Deputy Bennett Brown, one of the deputies involved, “admitted that his coworkers were upset that the plaintiffs had not spent the night in jail and that those feelings likely played a role in when the warrants describe in paragraph nineteen were served.”.This time, it was a Sunday night, and the couple said Proffitt told them they could thank the magistrate they didn’t have to spend the night in jail the first time, but they would spend the night in jail this time.The next day, Proffitt went to a different magistrate to get new warrants for the couple’s arrest.The couple say Proffitt charged them with “breach of peace.” A magistrate immediately released them on their own recognizance.Here’s how the lawsuit, filed in March 2016, outlines what happened: The couple accused him of alleged assault, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process and malicious prosecution. News13 obtained a copy of the lawsuit on Thursday that outlines the allegations a husband and wife made against Proffitt. UPDATE: A recently terminated Florence County sheriff’s deputy, Brian Proffitt, had faced a lawsuit in 2016 for assault and false imprisonment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |